Institute of Agricultural & Environmental Research

Tennessee State University

IAgER Home

Research Teams

Nursery Research Center

News & Events

IAgER Directory

Seminar Series Abstract

Blue divider bar, triple

Short Recertification Periods in the U.S. Food Stamp Program

Parke E. Wilde

Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
April 14, 2004

A major preoccupation of recent food stamp policy research has been to explain the large caseload fluctuations during the 1990s. Average monthly participation in the U.S. Food Stamp Program grew from 20.4 million persons in fiscal year 1990 to 27.9 million persons in fiscal year 1994, and then experienced an unprecedented 39 percent decline over the next six years, reaching 17.1 million persons in fiscal year 2000. During the period of caseload decline, the fraction of eligible people who participated in the program also declined, from 74.8 percent in 1994 to 59.3 percent in 2000.

In seeking an explanation for this caseload decline, researchers have turned to the arcane world of food stamp recertification policies. The Federal government requires States to recertify most participants in the Food Stamp Program at least once a year. In recent years, many States have dramatically increased their use of short recertification periods (3 months or less) in an effort to lower their food stamp error rates. This trend has been especially pronounced for working households. This study investigates the impact of recertification regimes on error rates and program participation rates, for households with and without earnings. Based on these estimates, it quantifies the tradeoff that States faced during the 1990s between maintaining low error rates and encouraging program participation.

During the study period, greater use of short recertification periods was associated with lower Food Stamp Program participation rates. Shorter certification periods could reduce participation in at least two ways: by removing households who became ineligible from the caseload, and by imposing administrative burdens that would discourage participation even by eligible households. A 10 percentage point increase in the frequency of short recertification periods for both working and nonworking households appeared to lower the number of food stamp participants as a fraction of the State population by around 2.7 percent.

 

Return to Seminar Series