|
Ecology of
Flatheaded Borers: Implications for Successful Management
in the Nursery and Landscape
Jason B.
Oliver1, Donna C. Fare2, Nadeer N. Youssef1,
Sue Scholl2, Mark A. Halcomb3, Michael E. Reding4,
and James J. Moyseenko4
1Tennessee State University, Institute of
Agricultural & Environmental Research, Otis L. Floyd Nursery
Research Center, McMinnville, TN; 2USDA-ARS National
Arboretum, Nursery Res. Center, McMinnville,
TN; 3University of Tennessee, Institute of Agriculture,
McMinnville, TN; 4USDA-ARS Horticultural Insects
Res. Laboratory, Wooster, OH
Institute of
Agricultural and Environmental Research
Seminar Series
Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN
February 22, 2006
A diverse group of
insects representing multiple orders, families, genera, and species
employ wood-boring as a life history strategy. A number of these
wood-boring insects are important pests of nursery crops and landscape
trees. The objectives of these studies were to 1) determine the
importance of wood-boring insects in middle Tennessee nursery and
landscape settings and identify key borer groups, 2) gather basic
biology data on key borers to facilitate management, and 3) identify
effective insecticide treatments for problem wood-borers. To accomplish
objective 1, a series of nursery and landscape surveys were conducted on
young trees (generally < 8 cm caliper) to evaluate borer incidence and
identify key borer groups. The survey results indicate borers are
important pests depending on tree species with damage ranging from 0 to
55% in landscape settings and 0 to 26% in nursery settings. Tree
species with the greatest frequency of damage were typically those with
a 'thin-barked' nature like ash, cherry, crabapple, dogwood, maple, and
redbud, while trees with ‘thicker-bark’ like oak had minimal damage.
Overall, borer management appeared to be better in nursery than
landscape settings. Flatheaded borers were the dominant borer group
attacking nursery and landscape trees with the exception of ash, which
had significant clearwing borer damage. Roundheaded borer damage was
rarely detected in nursery and landscape surveys. Chrysobothris
spp. were the predominant flatheaded borers reared from nursery stock,
but other species included Actenodes acornis, Acmaeodera
pulchella, Acmaeodera tubulus, and Ptosima gibbicollis.
All species were reared from maple, with the exception of P.
gibbicollis, which is found primarily on redbud. Under objective 2,
basic biology data was gathered on flatheaded borers during surveys
because these borers were the most important wood-boring group. Data
collected included how borers attacked nursery blocks using a global
positioning system, where attacks occurred on the tree trunk, trapping
methods to monitor flatheaded borers, and the diurnal timing of adult
flight activity. Results indicate borer attacks on tree blocks are
random to slightly aggregate. Flatheaded attacks on individual tree
trunks were predominantly below 20 cm in height and on the southwestern
side. Trapping studies determined that sticky traps with a reflectance
in the visible violet range of the electromagnetic spectrum were the
most attractive to flatheaded borer adults and two compounds were
identified as possible olfactory attractants for Chrysobothris
spp. Adult flatheaded borer flight activity as indicated by traps
occurred exclusively during daylight hours. Lastly, under objective 3,
we determined that systemic soil-applied neonicitinoid compounds like
AllectusTM (bifenthrin + imidacloprid), DiscusTM (imidacloprid
+ cyfluthrin), FlagshipTM 25WG (thiamethoxam), and MarathonÒ
60WP (imidacloprid) were effective treatments for preventing flatheaded
borer damage in nurseries. An experimental insecticide tablet with
imidacloprid (Merit FXT) was moderately effective, but was probably used
too late in the season for optimal control. A Dursban 4E trunk spray
was an effective flatheaded borer treatment when applied in mid-May and
late June in accordance with current extension recommendations.
Return
to Seminar Series
|